An online initiative of the Cancer Institute NSW

Improving cancer service performance

Research updates
Share this page Email this page to a friend Share this page via Twitter Share this page via Facebook Share this page via LinkedIn

Monitoring cancer outcomes and reducing clinical variation is one way to ensure that all cancer patients, regardless of where they live, receive the best evidence-based cancer treatment available.

Improving cancer service performance

A high quality, effective, efficient and sustainable cancer system must deliver, and optimise, outcomes for people with cancer. Monitoring cancer outcomes and reducing clinical variation is one way to ensure that all cancer patients, regardless of where they live, receive the best evidence-based cancer treatment available.

The Cancer Institute NSW provides program and research funding to Area Health Services (AHSs) to support cancer research, screening, data collection and cancer services. Historically, the funding and performance model has been de-centralised and program based and supported by specific key performance indicators (where measures were available) and/or quality improvement processes. This has limited the embedding of a quality improvement cycle supported by robust information and thus the impact of the funding.

The Cancer Institute NSW is implementing a Performance Monitoring Framework (PMF) to ensure a strong and consistent process that focuses on the key operational and financial issues confronting cancer services. The performance management framework aims to streamline reporting to key performance indicators for cancer control and to use the information generated to inform performance monitoring and drive quality improvement in cancer services in NSW.

Purpose

Under the PMF, grant funding to AHS's will be underpinned by a set of key performance indicators which align to the NSW Cancer Plan 2011-15.Cancer services will be supported by the PMF to identify and reduce variations in cancer outcomes. Strong data management systems, with valid and reliable data, as well as comparative data, underpin the framework.

Indicators for clinical performance monitoring and evaluation, developed in collaboration with NSW Oncology Groups and the proposed Cancer Networks and Local Health Networks (LHNs), have been developed, and will continue to be refined and reported against.

The system promotes the integration of health system monitoring into health information systems and planning cycles to inform and drive system changes and improve performance. The systematic appraisal and monitoring of health care via performance indicators also allows for monitoring of the impact of health system changes that have occurred. This provision and feedback of information forms the basis of regular review meetings to be held between LHNs, Cancer Networks and the Cancer Institute NSW.

Method

The development of the framework involved four phases:

  • Review of international cancer service indicators and consultation with stakeholders to determine indicators for NSW.
  • Development of a reporting strategy including data systems and sources.
  • Development of a performance review and quality improvement cycle.
  • A change management process was developed concomitantly.

Results

A Performance Management Framework, underpinned by a set of key performance indicators(KPIs), (Table 1) has been developed and comprises of:

  • Clearly stated performance requirements and targets.
  • A highly qualified clinical and quality expert review panel to review and guide performance.
  • Articulated KPIs and performance thresholds for each target that, if unmet, will trigger a formal intervention and/or escalation activities.
  • A robust performance management process that includes biannual face to face performance reviews.
  • Defined performance criteria to assess whether LHNs/CNs is addressing the cancer service performance and KPI targets at facility, clinical network/stream and LHN levels.
  • Transparent monitoring and reporting processes to ensure performance issues are identified early and responses are timely.
  • Clearly defined  levels of response to address performance issues that include:
  • clear roles and responsibilities at the LHN/CN level for meeting targets and supporting and implementing performance improvement; and
  • clear roles within the Cancer Institute NSW to manage performance review process and provide necessary support and guidance to LHNs/CN.
Proposed indicators for first round of funding
  • BreastScreen Participation rates
  • BreastScreen Accreditation status
  • Number  of Pap tests conducted by Women's Health Nurses (WHN's) by Local Government Area (LGA)
  • Number of Full Time Equivalent  Women's Health Nurses
  • Percentage of pap test performed on under screened and un-screened women
  • Average waiting time for radiotherapy treatment by priority group.
  • Percentage of patients who have undergone cancer surgery with 30 day post-operative mortality in specific DRGs
  • Number of patients with a notifiable cancer who are admitted to hospital with febrile neutropenia.
  • Number of patients undergoing radiotherapy who are admitted to hospital between day 2 of treatment and day 30 post cessation of treatment.
  • Patients' experience of the service (quantitative & qualitative)
  • Case completion within 6 months of diagnosis and 1st course of treatment completion within 18 months of diagnosis.
  • Number of dataset extensions implemented in collaboration with MDT groups.
  • Proportion of cases with an ECOG status recorded for Colorectal, Lung, Lymphoma and Upper GI.
  • Proportion of Stage IV cases with referral to palliative care recorded.
  • Number of tumour-specific meetings where reports are presented to clinicians.
  • Number  of clinical trials by tumour type
  • Increase in number of patients enrolled on clinical trails
  • Proportion of staff with 0.2 FTE or greater of dedicated research time

 

Draft performance management framework
Draft Performance Management Framework

 

Proposed performance review structure
Proposed performance review structure

Conclusion

Information generated by the monitoring of key performance indicators is integral to an effective performance management framework and the subsequent adoption by cancer services of a continuous quality improvement cycle to improve outcomes for cancer patients. Robust information increases accountability and allows benchmarking of performance at a service level thus maintaining a focus on the continual improvement of cancer outcomes in NSW.

Top of page