An online initiative of the Cancer Institute NSW

Management of extravasation in cancer patients: what is the evidence?

Research updates
Share this page Email this page to a friend Share this page via Twitter Share this page via Facebook Share this page via LinkedIn

Extravascular escape of intravenously administered cytotoxic drugs can result in serious local soft tissue injury.

Management of extravasation in cancer patients: what is the evidence?

Injury can range from simple phlebitis to chemical cellulitis, or in extreme cases, frank tissue necrosis that necessitates skin grafting or, in rare circumstances, may require amputation. Published vesicant extravasation incidence rates range from 0.01 per cent to 6.5 per cent.1

Purpose

Access to evidence-based protocols may minimise the risk of extravasation and lead to timely recognition, management and decreased morbidity should extravasation occur.

The aim of this work is to provide clinicians with a current and evidence-based extravasation management protocol on the eviQ Cancer Treatments Online website.

Method

A systematic literature review was undertaken including CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Clinical Evidence, EBMR Pubmed and Google Scholar, hospital based protocols and professional organisations.  The current evidence and recommendations were debated at eviQ reference committee meetings.

Results

A safe administration of intravenous chemotherapy protocol and an extravasation management protocol was developed by clinicians. These protocols cover prevention, the recognition of extravasation, the possible treatments with antidotes, an immediate management quick-links table, immediate management flow charts, an assessment chart and patient information.  Over the past five months these protocols have received 6,815 visits on the eviQ website from all Australian states and territories with an average time spent on each page of 1 minute 39 seconds.

Numerous questions remain unanswered about the issues surrounding extravasation management. Although several drugs and substances have been evaluated as vesicant extravasation antidotes and treatments, data on their safety and efficacy are limited and largely based on the results of animal studies and case reports. In addition, local and international protocols have conflicting recommendations and show a wide variation in clinical practice. This has highlighted the importance of collecting case reports systematically on extravasation injuries.

In 2011 eviQ will undertake a two phased study. The first phase will be to collect extravasation case reports through a standardised data collection form available on eviQ. Reporting will be voluntary and all information de-identified. Information collected will include demographics, location and types of extravasation injuries, contributing factors, types of catheters used, fluid and medications, antidotes and treatment outcomes which will be followed longitudinally.  The second phase of the project will be to undertake either a cohort or case series analysis of the data.

Conclusion

It is envisaged that collecting information on the management of extravasation injuries through a standardised central reporting database will help to measure the effectiveness of interventions, improve patient outcomes on an ongoing basis, and build on the current evidence.

Some of the resources, protocols and assessment tools for extravasation management available on eviQ

References

  1. Polovich, M; White, J. & Kelleher, L.(eds) 2005. "Chemotherapy and Biotherapy Guideline". 2nd Ed. Oncology Nursing Society. Pittsburgh.
Top of page